Increasingly, I am interested in what social factors are responsible for widely increased experience among a great many people of ‘mental instability'–including mental stress, anxiety, and, at its worst, even more than that, panic and depression. I have noticed, with deep concern, this rapidly accelerating among my students in recent years and I have wanted to better understand how and why it is happening in order to aim to counter it, and to do so much more effectively and proactively than merely responding with empathetic understanding and compassionate support once individual students individually and (semi-) privately identify to me this is what they are, or have been, experiencing. As I work on both of my book projects, 21st Century British TV Detective Series: a Critical Guide and Ian Curtis, The Myth and The Music–Critical Theoretical Perspectives I recognize a common major emphasis is understanding and confronting historically contingent social factors responsible for serious challenges to especially mental but also physical health. I am seeking to understand what historically contingent social factors explain ready tendencies toward crisis and how and why the need for empathy and solidarity is increasingly so desperate yet simultaneously increasingly so overwhelmingly inadequately met. I am interested in how in one case a particular life story, and a particular body of artistic work, alongside an incredibly daring yet also incredibly overwhelming artistic mission, can help illuminate issues of fundamental and ultimate concern, as they are experienced in relation to distinct continuous–as well as developing and transforming varieties of discontinuous–shaping forces particular to, even perhaps peculiar to, modern to contemporary capitalist society. I am interested in the same in relation to a body of fictional TV series ostensibly concerned with crime and detection but ultimately attesting and responding to a much deeper and more urgent set of grave concerns–indeed of decisively contingent as well as markedly exigent socially shared fears, anxieties, and traumas.
I am currently reading Shoshana Zuboff's The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, London: Profile, 2019. Zuboff argues we are now at an historic point where a new form of capitalism has become increasingly dominant: surveillance capitalism. Her book offers powerful arguments, theoretical constructions and elaborations, as well as research and documentation to support her thesis. As Zuboff indicates, in an initial summary “Definition,” Surveillance Capitalism means the following:
1. A new economic order that claims human experience as free raw material for hidden commercial practices of extraction, prediction, and sales; 2. A parasitic economic logic in which the production of goods and services is subordinated to a new global architecture of behavioral modification; 3. A rogue mutation of capitalism marked by concentrations of wealth, knowledge, and power unprecedented in human history; 4. The foundational framework of a surveillance economy; 5. As significant a threat to human nature in the twenty-first century as industrial capitalism was to the natural world in the nineteenth and twentieth; 6. The origin of a new instrumentarian power that asserts dominance over society and presents startling challenges to market democracy; 7. A movement that aims to impose a new collective order based on total certainty; 8. An expropriation of critical human rights that is best understood as a coup from above: an overthrow of the people's sovereignty.
Although Zuboff appears to be an adherent of a reformed and highly regulated capitalism, involving a careful balance between the powers of capital and the powers of the people, not in other words of socialism per se, her argument does offer much of use to a democratic socialist politics, and she does draw upon Marx as well as a variety of other classic social theorists–along with many compelling contemporary sources. I am highly interested in reading more work like this (which, in Zuboff's case, has been acclaimed by the likes of Naomi Klein, Robert Reich, and Joseph Turow, among numerous other prominent figures, as one of the most important books of our time), especially in relation to understanding the late 20th through early 21st century social construction, social enforcement, and social reinforcement of anxiety, insecurity, and instability, at the level of psychology and physiology as well as political economy.
Certainly I note well, once again, contemporarily pervasive cyber-existence often feels much more dystopian than utopian and is often draining of vitality (while shredding survival spaces) from within lived experience and as part of genuine social connection. When this cyber-existence becomes overdetermined by the interests and needs of surveillance capitalism it is not hard to recognize why I among many others might often experience periods of considerable mental–as well as physical–fragility. Much of these discontents are representative of frustration at what is not enabled (within an internet social media environment along with a vast array of digital ‘apps' that promise so much) but much of it also is representative of resistance to what it does enable, even if this resistance is far from all that effective and is still quite embryonically inchoate.
I am striving to find my way back to a more confident and stable position. Two days ago I posted the following on Facebook, although I do recognize the irony, as posting virtually anything on Facebook is hardly likely to be helpful in this quest:
I am cautiously optimistic. I am focusing deliberately on what I am doing and can do that is meaningful and valuable while refusing to criticize myself for not being other than I am and can be. All three of my classes this semester are going exceedingly well. We are learning together while having fun and we are developing a strong collective rapport. I enjoy everything having to do with these classes a great deal and feel myself always totally relaxing while directly engaged in this work and these interactions. I am meeting my exercise goals. I am reading and writing. I am doing what I have set out to do in relation to institutional and community service. I am learning. My immediate family is wonderful. I am listening to and learning a lot about a great deal of music which I enjoy playing selections from on my weekly radio show. I do have much to be thankful for. And I appreciate, respect, and admire the many impressive contributions, accomplishments, and simply ways of being themselves I recognize among my colleagues and friends across campus and throughout the community. And I am thankful as well I recognize I maintain the strength to aim to do yet much more of value and use yet ahead, much to be determined, and to know that I yet can and I yet will. Every day presents opportunities as well as challenges. I am going to rise to meet them and accept that I am ‘good enough’ to do so. I am working hard to make myself truly feel all of that and to just get on with life day by day and even moment by moment as best I can while valuing the immediate experience for what it is, for all that it is. Since I always tend myself not to judge other people, and always instead imagine everyone else is multiple, complex, contradictory, and dynamic and it is useless to ridiculous for me to speculate concerning anything about other people where I don’t have good reason and ample evidence to do so, I need to give myself the same kind of respect. Repeatedly in my life I have been shocked to discover a good number of other people do tend readily to quickly judge and speculatively fill in elaborate fabricated ideas of what yet other people around them supposedly are like and what supposedly is and has been going on with these yet other people, based on the relatively superficial and with otherwise little support to do so, and this has also scared me because it is a mindset so foreign to my own it is still extremely hard for me even to begin to imagine what it is like to be like this, to think like this. I have long readily and easily distinguished critique of positions and practices from criticism of persons and felt like it was an obvious and almost ‘natural’ distinction but I understand that is by no means always the case for everyone, not at all. But instead of perceiving that mindset of mine as some kind of serious personal shortcoming I think I should accept it as the way I am and tend to be, and respect what is positive about being as I am and tend to be. Instead of worrying excessively about being too naively idealistic, romantic, intuitive, trusting, and so on I am moving to the point of accepting this is simply what I have to offer. In conclusion, I hope what I share here and elsewhere in relation to ‘overcoming depression’ might prove helpful to others, whether experiencing this struggle directly themselves or struggling to know how to be helpful and supportive to others they know and with whom they are close when these others are depressed.
The struggle is ongoing, and cannot be simply wished or willed away, but I am definitely committed to the struggle. Much of what is required is seizing control back, as best and as far as I can, from what is too easily robbed from me, and recognizing what is responsible for the latter so I can work around and as possible against (that, is, circumvent) it. I am indeed working on it. And I am ready to use whatever resources might prove helpful, no matter their otherwise apparently considerable limitations. Since according to the Meyers-Briggs' personality test I always come out INFP–Introversion-Intuition-Feeling-Perceiving–and I do find many of the tendencies ostensibly associated with this kind of personality type do make ample good sense, of my own experience, and of what I have found hard as well as easy in that experience, I am willing to make use of this classificatory schema, with qualification, as I remain skeptical about it and do at times consider it to be little better than astrology. Much of what is required for me moving forward is determining an array of focuses for life-praxis that make sense, that are fulfilling, that balance each other well, and that are practically possible, while refusing to conflate useful and necessary self-critique with harshly judgmental self-condemnation. Accepting what is and has become the kind of person I am, and working with and off of this, is crucial–and, even if and when I desire to be different, I need to learn to accept the necessity of being highly patient in the process of attempting this kind of change. Also, oddly enough, this process of ‘recovery' toward ‘redetermination' involves recognizing and accepting tendencies toward anxiety and even panic and depression, as well as toward a variety of chronic physical illnesses, for what they are, and reconceiving these tendencies not solely as weaknesses but rather as signature features, or signature characteristics, that can indeed be highly positively useful. Do what I can, as I can, as whom I am, from when and where I am, and take comfort and seek contentment in simply that.






























































